So, I have been running in both the neutral Newton Performance Racer and Brooks Launch for several weeks. Both shoes have their own… well uniqueness. So what I am going to try to do is give my own review on two popular racers that we all have seen in races, training and social runs.
First off lets talk about price. There is a considerable price difference between the two racers. The Newton Performance Racer is $155 and the Brooks Launch is $90. I know, what if I actually like/love the Newton’s. Paying $155 for a pair can get pricey, but if they work and feel great, why not? Now the Brooks Launch, $90 is much more reasonable especially if I like/love them.
How do they feel:
Well the with the Newton Performance Racer coming in at an amazing 8.3oz you will not be complaining that this shoe slows you down. The Brooks Launch is another shoe you will not be complaining about coming in at 9.1oz. If your looking for a light trainer/racer, both shoes will fit the bill.
Running in the Newton Performance Racer will take some time to get use to because of how it simulates barefoot running. The shoe has more cushion from toe to heel rather the heel to toe as most running shoes. The reason is because of the “Actuator Lugs” (which are located at the midfoot) which feels like stepping on something cushioning which gives you a spring like feel (more on this later). The Brooks Launch is ready to go out of the box. Although with any shoe you should go through the “break in period”, I did not. I got a good 4 miles in the first day I tried them on. Now at first glance, I wasn’t convinced that this shoe was what I was looking for. The heel looked bulky and it just seemed to be a heavy shoe. Once the shoe was in my hands, I was amazed how light the shoe was. I immediately was excited because of the sticker price and the color (red/orange) just looked bad ass. The Brooks Launch felt great on my foot, almost a sock like feel. The sole design is similar to the Newton in the sense that it is made for speed. There is more padding in the midfoor then the heel which makes for a flatter position at foot strike.
Why is the flatter position important? Well, when you run faster you will push off from your midfoot/forefoot. Have you ever seen a fast runner strike with their heel first? No, because too much energy is lost with the heel to toe transition. Every fast runner runs in an aggressive position. Leaning forward at the hips and striking on the mid/forefoot. So, both shoes are designed for the forefoot runner in mind.
Now on slow runs both shoes are drastically different. I tend to become a little lazy when it comes to a slow/long run (8:30-9:00 min pace). I am not in the aggressive position as I mentioned above but more in a relaxed position which means I tend to heel strike. I have to make a sub-conscience effort to land on my forefoot but, that doesn’t always happen. So with that being said, I tend to notice when using the Newton Performance Racer on these sort of runs my Achilles tendon is not happy. Granted, when I pick up the pace (landing more on my fore/midfoot) the pain goes away. So, because of my laziness I do not use these shoes on slow/long runs. Now the Brooks Launch is another story. The shoe is more forgiving on these slow/long runs. I do not notice any Achilles issues only more tiredness since I wasted more energy with the heel to toe transition.
Real Test:
So I decided to try these shoes out on two different road races. The Newton’s I used on the Oklahoma City Half Marathon and the Brook Launch pacing the Heels and Hills Half Marathon.
The OKC half was going to be my first race back from knee surgery (just a scope) and I was looking forward to it. The Newton’s felt great through out the whole race. The “actuator lugs” that I spoke about earlier was not an issue, in fact I didn’t feel them through the entire race. I did PR (1:43:52) the race but I was left with some memories. Even though I didn’t feel the lugs through the race. My left foot had a blister in the midfoot area right where the lugs are located on the shoe. In addition, my second toe nail was bruised. Was it because of the shoe who knows, but toe nails are overrated anyway.
So all in all, the shoe handled well.
The Heels and Hills half was something I committed to pace last year (2009) and I wasn’t going to miss it. The only problem was going to be which pace group was I going to be in. When all the times came out, I was selected to do the 2:20 group. Even though this was going to be approx 40 min slower then what I am capable of finishing this race in, I had no problem helping out the ladies of Heels and Hills. So, the Brooks Launch was the shoe of choice since I knew I had the potential of heel striking at this pace. The Launch held up better then I expected. Not only did I not experience any Achilles pain, the shoe had a lot of “spring” in it to get me through the end. The only discomfort I experienced where in my quads because that was a slow pace for me and I forgot to put glide on the thighs since I was wearing a running skirt (that is another story).
Verdict:
I still plan on running in my Newton Performance Racer but maybe only for shorter tempo runs. They feel great and at $155, they might last me a little longer if I keep it under 10K distances. The Brooks Launch has proven not only to be a good trainer/racer but also very durable shoe that one can transition to if they are looking for a minimalist shoe. At $90, it won’t affect your pocket book if you do not love them. But I am sure, that will not be the case.
-Kyle